Documents of Interest

Current Topics in Ethics and Law

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
www.apa.org/ethics.
American Psychological Association. (2007). Record keeping guidelines. American Psychologist, 62, 993-1004.
www.apa.org/practice/recordkeeping.pdf.
Appelbaum, P.S., & Meisel, A. (1986). Therapists' obligations to report their patients' criminal acts. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 14, 221-230.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bsl.2370050208
Aronson, R. H. (2001). Symposium: The Uniform Rules of Evidence (1999): The Mental health provider privilege in the wake of Jaffee v. Redmond. Oklahoma Law Review, 54, 591-612.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=379472
Canadian Psychological Association. (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.).
http://www.cpa.ca.
Canter, A. (2001, September). Test protocols, Part II: Storage and disposal. Communique, p. 16-19.
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 USCS § 6501.
http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. (Pub. L. No. 93-380), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g.
http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
Handelsman, M.M., & Gottlieb, M.C. (2005). Training ethical psychologists: An acculturation model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 59-65.
http://content.apa.org/journals/pro/36/1/59.html
Hansen, N.D., & Goldberg, S.G. (1999). Navigating the nuances: A matrix of considerations for ethical-legal dilemmas. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 30, 495-503.
http://content.apa.org/journals/pro/30/5/495.pdf
Hansen, N.D., Pepitone-Arreola-Rockwell, F., & Greene, A.F. (2000). Multicultural competence: Criteria and case examples. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 652-660.
http://www.phhp.ufl.edu/~rbauer/Intro%20CLP/hansen_et_al_2000.pdf
Harvey, V.S., & Carlson, J.F. (2003). Ethical and professional issues with computer-related technology. School Psychology Review, 32, 92-107.
www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5001926133
Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act of 2004 (Pub. L. No. 108-455).
http://idea.ed.gov/.
Jaffee v. Redmond. 51 F.3d 1346, 1358, 116 S. Ct. 334 (1996).
http://jaffee-redmond.org/.
Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2003). An overview of the major changes in the 2002 APA ethics code. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 301-308.
Pipes, R.B., Holstein, J.E., & Acguirre, M.G. (2005). Examining the personalprofessional distinction. American Psychologist, 60, 325-334.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943525
Protection of Pupil Rights Act (Pub. L. No. 107-111).
http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ppra/index.html.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. No. 93-112), 29 U.S.C. § 794.
http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/reg/narrative.html.

Sample Forms and Policy Statements

Analysis of Impact of Federal Education Law on Board Rules Governing Informed Consent
The Texas State Psychology Board, which credentials Licensed Specialists in School Psychology, has adopted a policy statement on informed consent for school psychological services. Although this document is applicable only in Texas, it is a well-written example of how the NASP Principles for Professional Ethics can be incorporated in a policy document.



About School Psychology About NASP Membership Professional Standards & Training NASP Practice Model Self-Assessment for School Psychologists Standards for Ethics NASP-Approved Programs State Credentialing Info NASP Graduate Educators Information Approved Training Program Information Continuing Professional Development National Certification Conventions Communications / Media Advocacy / Public Policy Resource Library Career Center Publications / Store Communities	Documents of Interest Current Topics in Ethics and Law American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073. www.apa.org/ethics. American Psychological Association. (2007). Record keeping guidelines. American Psychologist, 62, 993-1004. www.apa.org/practice/recordkeeping.pdf. Appelbaum, P.S., & Meisel, A. (1986). Therapists' obligations to report their patients' criminal acts. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 14, 221-230. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bsl.2370050208 Aronson, R. H. (2001). Symposium: The Uniform Rules of Evidence (1999): The Mental health provider privilege in the wake of Jaffee v. Redmond. Oklahoma Law Review, 54, 591-612. http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=379472 Canadian Psychological Association. (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). http://www.cpa.ca. Canter, A. (2001, September). Test protocols, Part II: Storage and disposal. Communique, p. 16-19. Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 USCS § 6501. http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974. (Pub. L. No. 93-380), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html Handelsman, M.M., & Gottlieb, M.C. (2005). Training ethical psychologists: An acculturation model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 59-65. http://content.apa.org/journals/pro/36/1/59.html Hansen, N.D., & Goldberg, S.G. (1999). Navigating the nuances: A matrix of considerations for ethical-legal dilemmas. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 30, 495-503. http://content.apa.org/journals/pro/30/5/495.pdf Hansen, N.D., Pepitone-Arreola-Rockwell, F., & Greene, A.F. (2000). Multicultural competence: Criteria and case examples. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 652-660. http://www.phhp.ufl.edu/~rbauer/Intro%20CLP/hansen_et_al_2000.pdf Harvey, V.S., & Carlson, J.F. (2003). Ethical and professional issues with computer-related technology. School Psychology Review, 32, 92-107. www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5001926133 Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act of 2004 (Pub. L. No. 108-455). http://idea.ed.gov/. Jaffee v. Redmond. 51 F.3d 1346, 1358, 116 S. Ct. 334 (1996). http://jaffee-redmond.org/. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2003). An overview of the major changes in the 2002 APA ethics code. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 301-308. Pipes, R.B., Holstein, J.E., & Acguirre, M.G. (2005). Examining the personalprofessional distinction. American Psychologist, 60, 325-334. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943525 Protection of Pupil Rights Act (Pub. L. No. 107-111). http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ppra/index.html. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. No. 93-112), 29 U.S.C. § 794. http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/reg/narrative.html. Sample Forms and Policy Statements Analysis of Impact of Federal Education Law on Board Rules Governing Informed Consent The Texas State Psychology Board, which credentials Licensed Specialists in School Psychology, has adopted a policy statement on informed consent for school psychological services. Although this document is applicable only in Texas, it is a well-written example of how the NASP Principles for Professional Ethics can be incorporated in a policy document.