NASP Home > Publications/Store > NASP School Psychology Review > NASP SPR Supplements > NASP SPR Supplement 4
The Taped Problems
Intervention: Increasing Multiplication Fact Fluency
Using a Low-Tech
Time Delay Intervention
Elizabeth McCallum,
Christopher Skinner, Haley Turner, Lee Saecker,
University of Tennessee
With the advancement of response-to-intervention
(RTI) models of service delivery, school psychologists have renewed their
focus on developing and implementing evidenced-based interventions in order
to prevent and remedy academic skill deficits. Students who do not respond
to evidence-based interventions can be identified early and more intense
and student-specific assessment and intervention procedures can be used to
enhance their skill development and learning. At all levels of service delivery,
the success of current RTI models of service delivery requires practical,
effective, and efficient research-based interventions.
Elementary school teachers commonly report that
students are not quick (i.e., automatic, fluent) with their basic math facts (addition,
subtraction, multiplication, and division) and that this impedes the teaching
of more advanced math skills. In this study, we used a multiple-baseline
across tasks design to empirically validate the taped-math intervention,
a class-wide procedure designed to enhance math fact fluency.
This taped-math intervention was conducted with
a general education third-grade class of 18 racially and intellectually diverse
students. The intervention included a series of tapes with multiplication
facts and their answers spoken with varying delays between the problems and
their answers. The students were given follow-along sheets and told to try
to “beat the tape” by writing the answers before they heard them on the tape. Although
researchers implemented the intervention, the taped math intervention is
designed to be easily administered by teachers or students themselves.
Each day, a tape of multiplication problems and
answers was played. Each tape consisted of a series of 12 problems repeated
four times. The first time through, the problems were spoken with no delay
between each problem and its answer. The next time they were read, the
problems had 4 second delays before their answers were read. The final 2
repetitions included 2 second delays. The initial no-delay series was used
to discourage students from using time-consuming finger counting procedures. The
long (4 second) delay was used to give the students some time to come up
with the answers on their own. The delays were then decreased (2 second)
to promote rapid or fluent responding.
We assessed the students’ progress with a series
of 1 minute tests that included the same problems from the tape. The results
were analyzed and graphed. They showed that the majority of students (13
of 18) dramatically improved their multiplication fact fluency (rapid and
accurate responding) following the implementation of the intervention. Additionally,
most students maintained their increased performance. Finally, most students
reported liking the intervention and thinking that their friends would like
learning math facts this way too.
The taped math intervention provides a simple,
low-tech, time and resource efficient procedure for getting students to become
more automatic on their math facts. It can be administered class-wide by
teachers or self-administered at individual learning centers by students
themselves. The intervention and group assessment procedures may also be
used to identify students who are not making progress (e.g., failing to respond
to the intervention) so that other procedure can be applied to enhance their
skill development.
Resources
In addition to the current study, we
have conducted several other studies of the taped-problems procedure. One
is publish and the other two should appear shortly. Furthermore, we have
another article that will appear shortly in School Psychology Review which
describes a study using similar procedure to enhance sight-word reading of
an English Language Learner.
Other Taped-Problems Intervention Studies
McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., & Hutchins,
H. (2004). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing
division fact fluency using a low-tech self-managed time-delay intervention. Journal
of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 129-147.
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., &
Jaspers, K. E. (in press). Evaluating and comparing interventions
designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare
versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education.
Carroll, E., Skinner, C. H., Turner, H., McCallum,
E., & Masters, S. (in press). Evaluating and comparing responsiveness
to two interventions designed to enhance math-fact fluency. School
Psychology Forum: Research in Practice.
Similar Procedure (Tape-Words) Used to Enhance
Sight-word Reading
Bliss, S.,
Skinner, C. H., & Adams, R. (in press). Enhancing
sight-word reading with a time delay taped-words intervention with an English
language learning fifth-grade student. School
Psychology Review.