NASP Home > About NASP > NASP Position Papers > Position Statement on Sexual Minority Youth
Position
Statement on Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (GLBTQ)
Youth (formerly Sexual Minority Youth)
The National Association
of School Psychologists supports equal access to education and mental health
services for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (GLBTQ)
youth within public and private schools. Violence and intimidation violate
the right of GLBTQ students to receive equal educational opportunities,
regardless of whether the violence takes the form of direct harassment
of individual students or is directed at the entire group through hostile
statements or biases. Failure to address harassment and intimidation in
the school setting perpetuates an environment that is unsafe and not supportive
of academic or social achievement. NASP believes that school psychologists
are ethically obligated to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity
for the development and expression of their personal identity in an environment
free from discrimination, harassment, violence, and abuse. To achieve this
goal, education and advocacy must be used to reduce discrimination and
harassment against GLBTQ youth by students and staff.
Youth who are lesbian,
gay, bisexual, transgender, those who question their sexual orientation
or gender identity, or those who are gender non-conforming, are at great
risk for a number of dangerous or harmful situations or activities (D’Augelli, 2006; Hollander, 2000). These risk factors often
impair their ability to access and benefit from education. The most prominent
risks include suicide, physical and verbal harassment, physical violence,
exposure to sexually transmitted diseases (including HIV), and substance
abuse (D’Augelli, 2006; Bontempo & D’Augelli,
2002; Ryan & Futterman 1998). In addition,
these youth are at increased risk for emotional and physical rejection
by their families and may become homeless as a result of the disclosure
of their sexual orientation or gender identity (Rivers & D’Augelli, 2001). Harassment and intimidation at school may
result in academic underachievement, disruption of schooling, or dropping
out to avoid an environment perceived as unsafe (Bontempo,
& D’Augelli, 2002; Harris Interactive &
GLSEN, 2005; Henning-Stout, James, & McIntosh, 2000). When surveyed,
GLBTQ students were five times more likely to report skipping at least one
entire day of school in the previous month because they felt unsafe or uncomfortable
due to their sexual orientation or gender identity (Harris Interactive & GLSEN,
2005). Members of other minority groups share their identity with families
and communities and, from them, learn effective coping strategies to counteract
prejudice and discrimination (Ryan
& Futterman, 1998). Society’s attitudes and behaviors toward GLBTQ youth put them at risk for verbal and
physical aggression, and thereby lessen their sense of safety. As a result,
many GLBTQ youth do not identify outwardly as such, rendering them invisible,
and with less access to resources to support healthy development and learn
appropriate problem solving. These youth may develop an internalized sense
of inadequacy and poor self-esteem. GLBTQ youth who also have disabilities
or are members of other minority groups may encounter additional barriers
to receiving appropriate education and mental health care within the school
system and society as a whole (Ryan & Futterman,
1998).
Creating Safe Schools
for GLBTQ Youth
Schools must maintain campuses that are safe and conducive to learning for
all students in order to promote and provide equal access to all school services
for GLBTQ youth. Individual and systems advocacy, education, and specific
intervention efforts are those that NASP believes are needed to create safe
schools for GLBTQ youth. These should include but not be limited to:
Establishing and enforcing
non-discrimination policies that apply to all
students. Many
schools already have non-discrimination policies, but these may not include
reference to sexual orientation and gender identity. Explicitly including
GLBTQ students in policy statements gives legitimacy to the school's
commitment to educating all students. Staff and students need to be
aware of the non-discrimination policy, and enforcement and consequences
must be consistently applied across incidents of harassment and intimidation. School
policies should mandate fair treatment of all students and equal access
to educational and mental health services within the schools. The gender
identity and expression of transgender students should be honored and
respected and should not be the basis for unfair or unequal treatment. Gender
non-conforming students who do not identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual,
or transgender should also be protected from harassment, discrimination
and violence.
Education of students and staff. Because many GLBTQ students choose
not to reveal their sexual orientation or gender identity for fear of harassment
(Rivers & D’Augelli, 2001), other students
and staff are often not aware of their status. Staff and students who are
aware and supportive may fear that openly advocating for GLBTQ youth may
increase the possibility that they will become targets for discrimination. Many
of those who are aware of GLBTQ youth in their school maintain misconceptions
regarding these youth and may lack information needed to address their
needs (Henning-Stout, James, & McIntosh, 2000). NASP supports educating
students and staff about GLBTQ youth and their needs through in-service
training about the range of normal human diversity including sexual orientation
and gender identity. NASP also supports the provision of information and
training about relevant research, the risks experienced by these youth,
and effective strategies for addressing harassment and discrimination directed
toward any student and improving the school climate. In addition, creating
an educational context that includes the broad array of human diversity
can help demystify sexual orientation and gender identity. This includes
infusing issues pertaining to sexual orientation and gender identity into
the curriculum, such as presenting theories about the development of sexual
orientation or gender identity in a science class, reading works of famous
gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender authors in a literature class, discussing
the GLBTQ rights movement in historical context with other civil rights
movements in a social studies class, or including GLBTQ demographic statistics
in math exercises. In addition, including GLBTQ issues in health education
can increase decision-making skills for all youth, by preparing them to
make positive choices and reducing unsafe behavior such as substance abuse,
unintended pregnancy through sexual exploration, and exposure to sexually
transmitted diseases including HIV. By including GLBTQ information within
the curriculum, educators can help decrease the isolation gay, lesbian,
bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth often feel as a result of
perceiving themselves as invisible or as misunderstood.
Direct intervention with perpetrators of harassment and discrimination. As with any instance of school violence, harassment and discrimination
against GLBTQ youth, or any gender non-conforming youth, should be addressed
both through applying consequences and educating the perpetrator. Counseling
and education should also be provided to the perpetrator to help prevent
future episodes of harassment. Because school staff may, knowingly or unknowingly,
discriminate against GLBTQ youth, NASP believes that support for such youth
must occur at all levels of schooling. Education should stress that discrimination
and harassment must be addressed regardless of the status of the perpetrator
and students, teachers, support staff, and administrators must all be educated
to make policies effective.
Direct intervention
and support for those students targeted for harassment and intimidation
and those exploring their sexuality or gender identity. An estimated one fourth of early
adolescents may question their sexual orientation or gender identity
(Hollander, 2000). NASP believes school personnel should make no assumptions
about youth who may be questioning, but provide opportunities for students
to develop healthy identities with the support of counseling. GLBTQ youth who also have disabilities or another kind of minority
status often face additional challenges to healthy development and may
need additional intervention and support. Nonjudgmental counseling
should be provided for students who have been targets of harassment,
those who are questioning their sexual orientation or gender identity,
those who may be perceived as GLBTQ, and those who may become targets
of harassment in the future by disclosing their status as gay, lesbian,
bisexual, or transgender. Students who have experienced harassment, intimidation
or other forms of discrimination need intervention and support to understand
their experiences, as well as to identify resources and strategies that
will allow them to experience safety in the school environment.
Promoting societal and familial attitudes and behaviors that
affirm the dignity and rights within educational environments of GLBTQ youth. Schools should promote awareness,
acceptance and accommodation of GLBTQ students and their needs in a
fair way. Within their own schools and in society as a whole, school
psychologists can promote attitudes that affirm the dignity and rights
of GLBTQ youth by becoming aware of and eliminating biases from their
own practice. They can model nondiscriminatory practice by making it
clear that they are willing to provide services to all students regardless
of sexual orientation, gender identity or other minority status. School
psychologists can promote and model affirming attitudes and use language
that is nondiscriminatory and inclusive. They can also collaborate
with other staff who understand the importance
of affirming diversity and supporting healthy development, including
sexual orientation and gender identity. By educating students and staff,
school psychologists can help change negative or indifferent attitudes
toward GLBTQ youth. Moreover, school psychologists can function as
powerful agents of change when they actively address slurs and openly
confront discrimination, and they can address the actions or statements
of other school staff or administrators who neglect the needs of GLBTQ
youth or who actively discriminate against them.
School psychologists can
provide information, expert opinions and evidence-based strategies to assure
that effective policies and practices are adopted and enforced. School
psychologists can be instrumental in increasing the acceptance and tolerance
of differences in the school environment by supporting development of student
groups that promote understanding and acceptance of human diversity, such
as gay-straight alliances (GSAs) which have a
positive impact on school climate (Harris Interactive & GLSEN, 2005).
Students who reported having GSAs in their schools
were “less likely to feel unsafe, less likely to miss school, and were
more likely to feel that they belonged at their school than students in
school with no such clubs”(Harris Interactive & GLSEN,
2005). School psychologists should also be informed about programs in the
community that facilitate and support healthy development of GLBTQ youth
and support their families, and become prepared to advise parents, school
personnel and youth about these resources. Finally, school psychologists
can encourage local, state, and national organizations to disseminate information
to parents and other groups that need to be aware of the issues related
to gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth in the schools.
Role of the School Psychologist
Because school psychologists
work directly with students as well as with staff and administrators, they
are uniquely positioned to affect policies and practices within the schools.
They can function as role models of ethical practice and inform staff and
students that they are available to all students regardless of sexual orientation
or gender identity. School psychologists can address issues of sexual orientation
and gender identity in in-service training with teachers and programming
for parents, and actively counter discriminatory practices. On an individual
level, in counseling sessions, school psychologists can be mindful that
sexual orientation and gender identity encompass a broad spectrum, and
that many students question their sexual orientation and gender identity
or are gender non-conforming. They should remember that without adequate
information and support, GLBTQ status can negatively affect self-esteem
and peer relationships. To serve groups of students, school psychologists
are also in a position to educate students about a number of issues related
to high risk behaviors that are especially frequent among gay, lesbian,
bisexual, transgender and questioning youth, creating a more inclusive
and healthier environment for both the school population in general and
GLBTQ youth in particular.
Summary
NASP recognizes that students
who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender as well as those who question
their own sexual orientation or gender identity, or those who are gender
non-conforming, may be at risk for a number of dangerous and destructive
behaviors as well as harassment, discrimination, and poor self-esteem due
to psychosocial stressors (Bontempo & D’Augelli,
2002; D’Augelli, 2006; Ryan & Futterman 1998). A successful program to address these issues educates both those
who discriminate and those who are discriminated against because of sexual
orientation, gender identity or gender non-conformity. School psychologists
can participate in education and advocacy on a number of levels: Promoting
non-discrimination policies, conducting school-wide in-service training,
actively addressing discrimination and neglect of student needs, sharing
information about human diversity and evidence-based practices to address
student needs, and modeling ethical practice through accepting and affirming
attitudes, language, and behaviors in daily interactions with all students
and staff. In addition, school psychologists can provide intervention to
individual students. Any program designed to address the needs of GLBTQ
youth should also include efforts to educate and support parents and the
community through collecting information about services and establishing
involvement with other organizations committed to equal opportunity for
education and mental health services for all youth. Schools can only be
truly safe when every student, regardless of sexual orientation and gender
identity, is assured of access to an education without fear of harassment,
discrimination or violence.
References
Bontempo, D., & D’Augelli,
A. (2002). Effects of at-school victimization and sexual orientation
on lesbian, gay, or bisexual youths’ health risk behavior. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 30, 364-374.
D’Augelli, A. (2006). Developmental
and contextual factors and mental health among lesbian, gay and bisexual
youths. In A. Omoto & H. Kurtzman,
(Eds.), Sexual orientation and mental health: Examining identity
and development in lesbian, gay and bisexual people (pp. 37-53). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Harris Interactive, & Gay,
Lesbian, and Straight Educators Network. (2005). From teasing
to torment: School climate in
America
, a survey of students and teachers. New York: Author.
Henning-Stout, M., James, S., &
McIntosh, S. (2000). Reducing harassment of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
and questioning youth in schools. School Psychology Review, 29,
180-191.
Hollander, G. (2000). Questioning
youth: Challenges to working with youths forming identities. School
Psychology Review, 29, 173-179.
Rivers, I, & D’Augelli, A. (2001). The victimization of lesbian, gay,
and bisexual youths. In D’Augelli,
A. & Patterson, C. (Eds.), Lesbian, gay and bisexual identities
and youth: Psychological perspectives (pp. 199-223). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, C., & Futterman, D. (1998). Lesbian
and gay youth: Care and counseling. New York: Columbia University Press.
Approved by the NASP Delegate Assembly,
July 2006